3
Metas de Enfermería

Metas de Enfermería

JUNIO 2013 N° 5 Volumen 16

Osteopenia and osteoporosis in women with risk factors

Section: Cover story

How to quote

Arrabal Órpez MJ, García Fernández FP, Laguna Parras JM, Rodríguez Torres MC, Ramírez Pérez C, Arrabal Órpez MC et al. Osteopenia y osteo­porosis en mujeres con factores de riesgo. Metas Enferm 2013; 16(5):26-30.

Authors

1María Jesús Arrabal Órpez, 2Francisco Pedro García Fernández, 3Juan Manuel Laguna Parras, 4María del Carmen, 5Carmen Ramírez Pérez, 6María del Carmen Arrabal Órpez, 7Margarita García Carriazo

Position

1Enfermera. Técnico de Investigación de la FIBAO (Fundación pública andaluza para la Investigación Biosanitaria de Andaluzía Oriental. 2Enfermero. Master en investigación e innovación en Salud, Cuidados y Calidad de vida. Coordinador de la Unidad de Estrategias de Cuidados. Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén.3Enfermero especialista en Salud mental. Complejo Hospitalario de Jaén. Servicio andaluz de Jaén.4Enfermera gestora de casos del CHJ.5Enfermera de la Unidad de Estrategia de Cuidados del CHJ.6Enfermera.7Ginecóloga de la Clínica Avicena de Jaén. Hospital de Alta Resolución de Alcalá la Real, Jaén.

Contact address

María Jesús Arrabal Órpez. Avda. Olivares, 4, 2º derecha. 23600 Martos (Jaén).

Contact email: pythew@hotmail.com

Abstract

Objective: to determine the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in women with risk factors in the province of Jaén, to identify the relationship between risk factors and the site on which the diagnosis test is conducted.
Materials and method: transversal descriptive study. It included women who visited a Gynecologist in the private setting. They underwent a bone density test of the hip and spine (DEXA technique).  Univariate analysis was conducted both for quantitative and qualitative variables. Hypothesis contrast was developed through Pearson Correlation Coefficient in quantitative variables, and Ji-square in qualitative variables.  
Results: the study was conducted on 151 women, with 56 years as median age, and an average BMI of 26.86. Of these, 57% underwent the test in order to prevent osteopenia and osteoporosis. There was a connection between age, weight and BMI (protective factor) and the diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. Prevalence of osteoporosis was 4% when the test was conducted on the hip, and 20% when it was conducted on the spine.
Conclusions: age is positioned as a risk factor for the presence of osteopenia and osteoporosis. Weight and increase in BMI seem to act as a protective factor in these women. There is an important diagnostic difference between them, based on the area in the body where the bone density test was performed, with a higher prevalence when performed on the hip.

Keywords:

bone density test; bone mineral density; gynecology; osteopenia; osteoporosiswomen

Versión en Español

Título:

Osteopenia y osteoporosis en mujeres con factores de riesgo

Artículo completo no disponible en este idioma / Full article is not available in this language

Bibliography

  • Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B, De Laet C, Dawson A. Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organitation criteria for osteopenia anda osteoporosis. Bone 2000; 27(5):585-590.
  • Adachi JD, Adami S, Gehlbach S, Anderson FA Jr, Boonen S, Chapurlat RD et al. Impact of prevalent fractures on quality of life: baseline results from the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85(9):806-813.
  • Jahelka B, Dorner T, Terkula R, Quittan M, Bröll H, Erlacher L. Health-related quality of life in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis with and without fractures in a geriatric rehabilitation department. Wien Med Wochenschr 2009; 159:235-240.
  • Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17(12):1726-33.
  • Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, Akhtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L et al. Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. CMAJ 2009; 181(5):265-271.
  • Konnopka A, Jerusel N, König HH. The health and economic consequences of osteopenia- and osteoporosis-attributable hip fractures in Germany: estimation for 2002 and projection until 2050. Osteoporos Int 2009; 20:1117-29.
  • Rapp K, Cameron ID, Kurrle S, Klenk J, Kleiner A, Heinrich S et al. Excess mortality after pelvic fractures in institutionalized older people. Osteoporos Int 2010; 21:1835-39.
  • Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis J. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 1997; 7:407.
  • Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 1992; 2:285.
  • Duclos A, Couray-Targe S, Randrianasolo M, Hedoux S, Couris CM, Colin C et al. Burden of hip fracture on inpatient care: a before and after population-based study. Osteoporos Int 2010; 21:1493-01.
  • Diez García MP, Chávez Arias DD, Ramírez Pérez E, Granados Rentaría R. Estudio epidemiológico de los factores sociomédicos de la osteoporosis en el Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación. Revista Mexicana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación 2007; 19:5-7.
  • Hermoso de Mendoza MT. Clasificación de la osteoporosis. Factores de riesgo. Clínica y diagnóstico diferencial. Anales Sis San Navarra 2003 26(supl.3):29-52.
  • Diez Pérez, A. Criterios de la administración de la THS en la menopausia. Barcelona: Conferencia de Consenso. Osteoporosis y menopausia; 1994.
  • Lorente Ramos RM, Azpeitia Armán N,. Arévalo Galeano N, Muñoz Hernández A, García Gómez JM, Gredilla Molinero J. Absorciometría con rayos X de doble energía. Fundamentos, metodología y aplicaciones clínicas. Radiología 2012; 54(5):410-423.
  • Fink HA, Harrison SL, Taylor BC, Cummings SR, Schousboe JT, Kuskowski MA, et al. Differences in Site-Specific Fracture Risk Among Older Women with Discordant Results for Osteoporosis at Hip and Spine: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Clin Densitom 2008; 11(2):250-259.
  • Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S et al. The use of multiple sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17(4):527-534.
  • Meeta Singh, Navneet Magon, Tanvir Singh. Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Midlife Health 2012; 3(2):76-80.
  • Álvarez Sanz C, Rapado A, Díaz Curiel M, García JJ, Carrasco JL, Honorato J et al. Prevalencia de osteoporosis determinada por densitometría en la población femenina española. Med Clin (Barc) 2001; 116(3):86-88.
  • Hadji P, Klein S, Gothe H, Häussler B, Kless T, Schmidt T et al. The Epidemiology of Osteoporosis-Bone Evaluation Study (BEST). An Analysis of Routine Health Insurance Data. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013; 110(4):52-57.
  • Pereira Sánchez A. Osteoporosis postmenopáusica correlación densitométrica y hormonal en función de la pérdida de masa mineral ósea. [Tesis doctoral] . Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 1994.
  • Diez García MP, Chávez Aria DD, Ramírez Pérez E, Granados Rentaría R. Estudio epidemiológico de los factores sociomédicos de la osteoporosis en el Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación. Revista Mexicana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación 2007; 19:5-7.
  • Greco E, Fornari R, Migliaccio S. Is Obesity Protective for Osteoporosis? Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density in Individuals with High Body Mass Index. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2010; 64(6):817-820.
  • Ibáñez A, Rokes C, León G, Calvo A. Evaluación de la densidad mineral ósea radio en ultradistal en mujeres y hombres de la costa, sierra y selva del Perú. Rev peru reumatol 2003; 9(1):9-25.
  • Balderramo DC, Rramacciotti CF, Douthat WG. Factores de riesgo para osteoporosis primaria en mujeres de Córdoba, Argentina: Medicina (B.Aires). 2004; 64(5):400-406.
  • Asomaning K, Bertone-Johnson ER, Nasca PC. The Association between Body Mass Index and Osteoporosis in Patients Referred for a Bone Mineral Density Examination. Journal of Women’s Health. 2006; 15(9):1028-34.