Hemodynamics. MAREC study, diagnosis of the nursing situation in Spain
Section: Artículos Científicos
How to quote
Enferm Cardiol. 2020; 27 (81): 21-31
Authors
Víctor Fradejas-Sastre1, Concepción Fernández Redondo2, Pascual García Hernández3, Juan José de la Vieja Alarcón4, Carmen Naya Leira5, Adrián Márquez López6, César Alberto Monteiro Teixeira7, Vicente Rubio Alcañiz8, Javier Muñiz García9
Position
1 Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander. 2 Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca. CIBERCV. IMIB-Arrixaca. Murcia 3 Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada. 4 Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid. 5 Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña 6 FGS Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona. 7 Hospital Universitario Donostia, Guipúzcoa. 8 Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. 9 IInstituto Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud-INIBIC, Universidad de da Coruña y CIBERCV.
Contact address
Víctor Fradejas Sastre. Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. Avda. Valdecilla s/n. 39008 Santander
Contact email: Victor.fradejas@scsalud.es
Abstract
The research on the situation of Nursing in Hemodynamics in Spain by the MAREC study arises in the Spanish Association of Nursing in Cardiology. Objective: to describe the available resources, the participation, the tasks and the level of autonomy of Nursing in Hemodynamics in Spain.
Methodology. Cross-sectional descriptive study carried out with the aid of a self-administrated questionnaire on the nursing characteristics, staff and role in Hemodynamics units of public, private or state-contracted hospitals in Spain.
Results. Participation was of 66.14% (n=84) of effective candidate centers (n=127). Out of these centers having been studied, 74 (88.1%) had a Hemodynamics unit. Murcia stands out with 2.40 hemodynamics units per million of inhabitants (national mean 1.59 units/million of inhabitants). 86.3% have an attention program for infarction code and 63.5% have an outpatient clinic. 54.1% have two nurses per ward and 33.8% have three nurses. Four centers have nursing consultation managed by hemodynamics nurses. 62.2% have check-list or pre-intervention verification list. In 6.8% of centers, there are Nursing Doctors, and in half of them no nurse has a master‘s degree. 52.7% had an average of 3.1±1.9 nurses certified as «Expert in Hemodynamics and Interventional Cardiology» by the SHCI-AEEC.
Conclusions. There is a big difference as regards to the resources available, the participation and the level of autonomy concerning hemodynamics nursing at national level. Future lines of study should analyze the unification of organization and human resources management criteria.
Keywords:
cardiovascular nursing; nursing staff; health resources; nurse specialists
Versión en Español
Título:
Hemodinámica. Estudio MAREC, diagnóstico de la situación de Enfermería en España
Artículo completo no disponible en este idioma / Full article is not available in this language
Bibliography
1. Pettijohn TL, Lawrence M. The impact of outcomes data reporting on access to health care of high-risk patients to interventional cardiologists in the United States. J Invas Cardiol.1999; 11: 111-5.
2. Cowley MJ, Faxon DP, Holmes DR. Guidelines for training, credentialling, and maintenance of competence for the performance of coronary angioplasty: a report from the interventional cardiology committee and the training program standards committee of the Society of Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diag.1993; 30: 1-4.
3. Nota de prensa. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Defunciones según la Causa de Muerte. 19 de diciembre de 2019. [Internet] [consultado 29 de abril de 2020] Disponible en: https://www.ine.es/prensa/edcm_2018.pdf
4. Osborne D, Gaebler T. El Gobierno inspirado en el cliente: satisfacer las necesidades del cliente, no las de la burocracia. En: Osborne D, editor. La Reinvención del Gobierno. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós;1994; p 241-276.
5. Parmley WW. Interventional Cardiology. An added qualification to the Cardiovascular Board. J Am Coll Cardiol.1998; 31: 716-7.
6. Hirshfeld JW, Ellis SG, Faxon DP, Block P, Carver JR, Douglas JS,et al. Recommendations for the assessment and maintenance of proficiency in coronary interventional procedures. Statement of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol.1998; 31: 722-43.
7. Gómez-Fernández M, Rodríguez-García-Abad V, Pedrosa-Carrera C, López-Zarrabeitia I, Buendía-Martínez S, Ocariz-Aguirre MA, et al. Perfil Profesional de Enfermería de Hemodinámica y Cardiología Intervencionista. Sistema de Acreditación Competencias Avanzadas. Versión 2018.1 ISBN: 978-84-09-03253-2 junio 2018 [Internet] [consultado 29 de julio de 2019] Disponible en: http://hemodinamica.enfermeriaencardiologia.com/wp-content/uploads/documento-de-perfil-normas-de-acreditacion.pdf
8. Fernández-Redondo C, de la Vieja-Alarcón J.J., Fradejas-Sastre V, García-Hernández P, Naya-Leira C, Rivera-Caravaca J.M., et al. Diagnóstico de la situación de la Enfermería en la atención cardiológica en España. Proyecto MAREC: Justificación, diseño y resultados generales. Enfermería en cardiología. 2019; 26 (77): 82-93.
