Fostering the implementation of health promotion in primary care: two nominal groups
Section: Originals
How to quote
Mujika A, Pumar Méndez MJ, Bermejo Martíns E, Hernantes N, Antoñanzas Baztán E, López Dicastillo O. Estrategias para impulsar la implementación de promoción de salud en Atención Primaria: dos grupos. RIdEC 2020; 13(2):59-70.
Authors
1,2 Agurtzane Mujika, 2,3,4 María Jesús Pumar Méndez, 4,5 Elena Bermejo Martíns, 2,6 Naia Hernantes, 2,4,7 Elena Antoñanzas Baztán, 2,3,4 Olga López Dicastillo
Position
1 Universidad del País Vasco. Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería. Donostia (San Sebastián).2 Grupo de investigación IMPULS (Investigación e Innovación para la Implementación de la Promoción de la Salud). Pamplona.3 Universidad Pública de Navarra. Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud. Pamplona. 4 IdiSNA, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra. Pamplona. 5 Universidad de Navarra. Facultad de Enfermería. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria y Materno-Infantil. Pamplona.6 Ayuntamiento de Donostia-San Sebastián.7 Departamento de Salud. Gobierno de Navarra. Pamplona.
Contact email: mj.pumarmendez@unavarra.es
Abstract
Purpose: to identify recommendations aimed at fostering implementation of health promotion in Primary Care.
Methods: two nominal groups were created, with 15 experts in health promotion, public health, primary care, and patient safety being involved in them. Two working rounds were performed, in which personal work, sharing and discussion among panelists on the identified items, as well as scoring such items, were combined. This process resulted in a list of items prioritized by participants.
Results: a consensus was reached by the experts on the strategies to implement a taxonomy for preventive and health promotion actions aimed at identifying gaps in this field; as well as critical items to implement strategies for health promotion in primary care. Among them, the following are highlighted: considering the implementation of health promotion as a process; questioning other agents; need for a clear and firm commitment to health promotion at the institutional level.
Conclusion: fostering health promotion in primary care requires a clear and firm commitment, along with the adoption of a capacity building approach and an implementation framework.
Keywords:
health promotion; Primary Health Care; consensus; capacity buildingimplementation science
Versión en Español
Título:
Artículo completo no disponible en este idioma / Full article is not available in this language
Bibliography
[1] World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Promotion [internet]. Geneva: WHO. [citado 8 nov 2020]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/en/
[2] Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad (MSSSI). Estrategia de promoción de la salud y prevención en el SNS en el marco del abordaje de la cronicidad en el SNS. Madrid: MSSE; 2014.
[3] Sobrino Armas C, Hernán García M, Cofiño R. ¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de “salud comunitaria”? Informe SESPAS 2018. Gac Sanit. 2018; 32:5-12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.07.005
[4] Martínez-Cía N, Pérez Pérez M, Heras-Mosteiro J, Gutiérrez Ávila G, Díaz-Olalla JM, Ruiz-Giménez JL. Encuentros y desencuentros entre salud comunitaria y Sistema sanitaria español. Informe SESPAS 2018. Gac Sanit. 2018; 32:17-21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.06.004
[5] Martín Zurro A. Alma Ata y medicina de familia: 40 años de travesía del desierto. Aten Prim. 2018; 50:203-4. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2018.02.002
[6] Rubio-Varela M, Pons-Vigués M, Martínez-Andrés M, Moreno-Peral P, Berenguera A, Fernández A. Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of primary prevention and health promotion activities in primary care: a synthesis through meta-ethnography. PloS One 2014; 9: e89554. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089554
[7] López-Dicastillo O, Canga-Armayor N, Mujika A, Pardavila-Belio MI, Belintxon M, Serrano-Monzó I, Pumar-Méndez MJ. Cinco paradojas de la promoción de la salud. Gac Sanit. 2017; 31:269-72. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.10.011
[8] Pumar-Méndez MJ, López-Dicastillo O, Hernantes N, Iriarte A, Belintxon M, García A, Mujika A. Development of a taxonomy of activities in health prevention and promotion for primary care. J Nurs Manage 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12980
[9] Moore GF, Evans RE, Hawkins J, Littlecott H, Melendez-Torres GJ, Bonell C, Murphy S. From complex social interventions to interventions in complex social systems: Future directions and unresolved questions for intervention development and evaluation. Evaluation 2019; 25:23-45. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018803219
[10] Rosas S, Knight E. Evaluating a complex health promotion intervention: case application of three systems methods. Crit Publ Health 2019; 29:337-52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1455966
[1] Delp P, Thesen A, Motiwalla J, Seshardi, N. Nominal Group Technique. In: Systems tools for project planning. Bloomington: International Development Institute; 1977. p. 14-7.
[12] Cantrill JA, Sibbald B, Buetow. The Delphi and nominal group techniques in health services research. Int J Pharm Pract 1996; 4:67-74.
[13] Segura A. El sistema sanitario, la Atención Primaria y la Salud Pública. Aten Prim. 2018; 50:388-9. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2018.01.001
[14] Cofiño R, Aviñó D, Benedé CB, Botello B, Cubillo J, Morgan A, Paredes-Carbonell JJ, Hernán M. Promoción de la salud basada en activos: ¿cómo trabajar con esta perspectiva en intervenciones locales? Gac Sanit. 2016; 30:93-8. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.06.004
[15] Phelan A, Mccarthy S, Adams E. Examining missed care in community nursing: A cross section survey design. JAN 2017;74:626-36. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13466
[16] López-Dicastillo O, Zabaleta-del-Olmo E, Mujika A, Antoñanzas-Baztán E, Hernantes N, Pumar-Méndez MJ. Missed nursing care” in health promotion: raising awareness. J Nurs Manage 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13016
[17] Esmail A, Valderas JM, Verstappen W, Godycki-Cwirko M, Wensing M. Developing a research agenda for patient safety in primary care. Background, aims and output of the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015; 21:sup1:3‐7. Doi: http://doi.org/10.3109/13814788.2015.1043122
[18] Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social. Gobierno de España. Resolución de 26 de abril de 2019, de la Secretaría General de Sanidad y Consumo, por la que publica el Marco estratégico para la Atención Primaria y Comunitaria. Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) [internet] núm. 109, de 7 de mayo de 2019. p. 48652 a 48670. [citado 8 nov 2020]. Disponible en: https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-2019-6761
[19] Grupo de trabajo sobre implementación de GPC. Implementación de Guías de Práctica Clínica en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Manual Metodológico. Plan de Calidad para el Sistema Nacional de Salud del Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud-I+CS. Guías de Práctica Clínica en el SNS: I+CS Nº 2007/02-02.
[20] NSW Health Department. A Framework for Building Capacity to Improve Health. NSW Health Department [internet] 2001 [citado 8 nov 2020]. Disponible en: https://yeah.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/A-Framework-for-Building-Capacity-to-Improve-Health.pdf
[21] Mead DM, Moseley LG. The use of Delphi as a research approach. Nurse Res. 2001; 8(4):4-23. Doi: http://doi.org/10.7748/nr2001.07.8.4.4.c6162
[22] Baker J, Lovell K, Harris N. How expert are experts? An exploration of the concept of ‘expert’ within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Res. 2006; 14(1):59-70. Doi: http://doi.org/10.7748/nr2006.10.14.1.59.c6010
[23] Halcomb E, Davidson P, Hardaker L. Using the consensus development conference method in healthcare research. Nurse Res. 2008; 16(1):56-71. Doi: http://doi.org/10.7748/nr2008.10.16.1.56.c6753
[24] Campbell SM, Cantril JA. Consensus methods in prescribing research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001; 26(1):5-14. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2710.2001.00331.x
