Nurses’ perception of aimprovement project in the campaign flu-covid 2023 vaccination in health zone MiralBueno, Zaragoza
Section: Originals
Authors
1 Beatriz Sánchez Hernando, 2 Lucía Gracia Saz, 3 Natalia Vaquero Calleja, 4 Mercedes García Entrena, 5 Natalia Pilar Fidalgo Pinilla
Position
1 Enfermera Familiar y Comunitaria. Centro de Salud Miralbueno. Zaragoza (España)2 Residente de Enfermería Familiar y Comunitaria. Centro de Salud Miralbueno. Zaragoza (España)3 Enfermera Familiar y Comunitaria. Centro de Salud Miralbueno. Zaragoza (España)4 Enfermera de Pediatría. Centro de Salud Miralbueno. Zaragoza (España)5 Enfermera. Responsable de enfermería. Centro de Salud Miralbueno. Zaragoza (España)
Contact email: beasanhern@gmail.com
Abstract
Objective: to describe the perception of nursing professionals about a new quality improvement project during the 2023 flu-covid vaccination campaign.
Methodology: a cross-sectional study was carried out in the nursing team of a health center prior to the campaign. Sociodemographic, acceptance, training, security and humanization variables regarding the improvement project were collected.
The procedure consisted of introducing a series of identification cards for each of the flu vaccines and another Covid vaccine, separated by color and with the corresponding information in writing. To collect data, a Google Forms questionnaire was administered. All questionnaires were anonymous and confidential. Informed consent was requested
Results: the participants were community nurses, pediatric nurses, nursing residents and nursing students. Acceptance of the project was very high. Most participants received sufficient training. Almost all of the participants perceived an increase in the safety and humanization of vaccination in relation to the quality project. It was perceived that the project would reduce vaccine administration errors.
Conclusions: it is necessary to implement improvement programs to increase the quality, safety and humanization of vaccination
Keywords:
vaccination; influenza human; COVID-19; Primary Health Care; nurses; quality improvement.
Versión en Español
Título:
Artículo completo no disponible en este idioma / Full article is not available in this language
Bibliography
1. United Nations Organization (UNO). Sustainable Development Goals [internet] 2015 [citado 15 nov 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/brochure/SDGs_Booklet_Web_En.pdf
2. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed Atenei Parm. 2020; 91(1):157-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397
3. Infantes Esteban S. Pandemia de COVID-19 en el siglo XXI. Revista de Derecho, Empresa y Sociedad (REDS). [internet] 2020 [citado 15 nov 2023]; 16:79-98. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7631164
4. Sakamoto H, Ishikane M, Ueda P. Seasonal influenza activity during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Japan. JAMA. 2020; 323:196971. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1001/jama.2020.6173
5. Reina J. La vacunación de la gripe en el tiempo del SARS-CoV-2. Med Clin (Barc). 2021; 56(1):17-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2020.10.012
6. World Health Organization (WHO). Global influenza strategy 2019-2030. World Health Organization [internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2019 [citado 15 nov 2023]. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311184
7. Ministerio de Sanidad. Recomendaciones de vacunación frente a gripe y COVID-19 en la temporada 2023-2024 en España. Actualización del 12 de septiembre de 2023 [internet]. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad; 2023 [citado 15 nov 2023]. Disponible en: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/areas/promocionPrevencion/vacunaciones/programasDeVacunacion/gripe/home.htm
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Understanding the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS). Atlanta (US): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013.
9. Hibbs BF, Moro PL, Lewis P, Miller ER, Shimabukuro TT. Vaccination errors reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, (VAERS) United States, 2000-2013. Vaccine. [internet] 2015 [citado 15 nov 2023]; 33(28):3171-8. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X15006209
10. Ortiz-Cabello L, Garrido-Ortiz C. Estrategias de enfermería para la prevención de errores programáticos en vacunatorio. Rev. Med. Clin. Condes. 2020; 31(3):330-42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2020.06.001
11. Barboza TC, Guimarães RA, Gimenes FRE, Silva AEBC. Retrospective study of immunization errors reported in an online Information System. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2020; 28:e3303. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3343.3303
12. Garrido-Elustondo S, García-Vallejo R, Nogales-Aguado P. Continuing education in primary care: the educational needs of its professionals. Aten Prim. 2002; 30(6):368-73. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6567(02)79049-5
13. Mirada G, Torres J, Borràs E, Estany P, Canals M, Rabanal M, Urbiztondo L. Percepción de los errores en la vacunación en Cataluña: un estudio transversal. Vacunas. 2020; 21(2):90-4. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacun.2020.06.001
14. Nunes MBM, Teixeira TCA, Gabriel CS, Gimenes FRE. Impact of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles on the reduction of errors related to vaccine administration. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2021; 30:e20200225. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2020-0225
