3
Metas de Enfermería

Metas de Enfermería

MAYO 2013 N° 4 Volumen 16

Organ Donation after unexpected death determined by circulatory criteria

Section: Ethics and Society

How to quote

Ortega Deballón IM, de la Plaza Horche E. Programa de donación de órganos tras muerte inesperada por criterios circulatorios. Metas Enferm 2013; (4):64-71.

Authors

1Iván Mª Ortega Deballón, 2Edurne de la Plaza Horche

Position

1Enfermero. Licenciado en Derecho. Especialista en Responsabilidad Sanitaria y Experto en Bioética. Enfermero de Emergencias. 2Enfermera UVI móvil 112. Instructora de soporte vital avanzado.

Contact address

Iván Mª Ortega Deballón. Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Madrid-112. Parque de Bomberos. Carretera A-1, km 68. 28752 Lozoyuela (Madrid).

Contact email: Iviortega@gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives: to analyze programs for uDCDD (Uncontrolled Donation after Cardiac Determination of Death), which have undergone modifications in their nomenclatures and definitions, exploring their likely causes. To review international recommendations about uDCDD programs, and clauses issued by the Maastricht Conference, in order to assess their level of enforcement by uDCDD programs active in Spain, France and the United States. To analyze those modifications put forward so that said programs are in accordance with scien­tific knowledge, good professional practice, ethics and legislation, while respecting the spirit and the principles reached by international consensus regarding organ donations.
Methodology: bibliographic review regarding current recommendations on resuscitation, focused on management of cardiorespiratory arrest (CRA) with a potentially reversible cause, identifying those techniques and treatments which are being used at an international level. The following databases were used: PubMed, CINAHL, CUIDEN and Cochrane Library. The review included articles in English, French and Spanish until 2012. The following variables were systematized: patient profile which benefits with non-conventional CRA measures, techniques and treatments implemented, and rate of survival without neurological deficit (Cerebral Performance Categories Scale, CPC). At the same time, a review was conducted for uDCDD programs in Spain, France and the United States, analyzing these variables: historical emergence, consensus documents, defining criteria and changes in terminology; there was also an active involvement in official forums from national and international agencies associated with organ donation.
Results and conclusions: DCD programs (Donation after Cardiac Determination of Death) have undergone modifications in terms of their nomenclature. In Spain, the uDCDD program, initiated in 1995, was called “Donantes a Corazón Parado” (“Non-Heart-Beating Donors”); and this triggered criticism, as the terminology was considered ambiguous. It was claimed that it could be interpreted that patient’s death had not occurred prior to organ extraction, which would violate the so-called rule of dead donors. Nursing staff represent a professional group which is actively involved in each one of the links and elements of the complex system which form the uDCDD programs. Professional excellence requires protocols in agreement with the status of science and art, with ethics and deontology, with lex artis and with trust by the society.

 

Keywords:

death by circulatory criteria; encephalic death; non conventional CRA programs; organ donationuDCDD programs

Versión en Español

Título:

Donación de órganos tras muerte inesperada por criterios circulatorios