3
Revista Iberoamericana de Educación e Investigación en Enfermería

Revista Iberoamericana de Educación e Investigación en Enfermería

JULIO 2021 N° 3 Volumen 11

Instrumentos que medem barreiras percebidas ao uso de métodos anticoncepcionais: revisão integrativa da literatura

Section: Reviews

How to quote

Rivera-Galvan A, Valdez-Montero C, Ortega Jiménez MC. Instrumentos que miden barreras percibidas al uso de métodos anticonceptivos: revisión integrativa de la literatura. Rev. iberoam. Educ. investi. Enferm. 2021; 11(3):53-61.

Authors

1 Alejandra Rivera-Galvan, 2 Carolina Valdez-Montero, 3 Mayra del Carmen Ortega Jiménez

Position

1 Estudiante de la Maestría en Ciencias de Enfermería. División Ciencias de la Salud e Ingenierías (DCSI) del Campus Celaya-Salvatierra (CCS). Universidad de Guanajuato (UG). Celaya, Gto, México.2 Doctora en Ciencias de Enfermería, adscrita a la Facultad de Enfermería de los Mochis de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa. Los Mochis, Sin., México. 3 Maestra en Ciencias de Enfermería adscrita al Departamento de enfermería y obstetricia (DEO) de la DCSI del CCS de la UG.

Contact email: a.riveragalvan@ugto.mx

Abstract

Purpose: to identify the available evidence from scientific literature on the definition of the concept of spiritual distress in primary caregivers.
Methods: a literature review was carried out in the databases PubMed (NCBI), Scielo virtual library, Science Direct and Google Scholar; articles less than five years old were considered; and the descriptors “spiritual distress”, “sufrimiento espiritual”, and “angustia espiritual” were used, among others.
Findings: a total of 450 articles were found, and 19 of them were selected for analysis. Spiritual distress is generally described in terms of the absence of spirituality, as a synonym of spiritual discomfort or spiritual pain, as well as in terms of assistance interventions by various health professionals.
Conclusions: this phenomenon of spirituality is widely explored in nursing. Once the vast literature that has defined this concept is understood, it is necessary to consider ways to develop specific and unique interventions for the care of spiritual suffering. This should be done not only in aspects of chronicity and death, but also in the daily field of professional practice: under specific theoretical references to address the phenomenon of caring for the human health experience.

Keywords:

contraceptives; contraceptive behavior; reproductive health; Sexual Health; women; nursing

Versión en Español

Título:

INSTRUMENTOS QUE MIDEN BARRERAS PERCIBIDAS AL USO DE MÉTODOS ANTICONCEPTIVOS: REVISIÓN INTEGRATIVA DE LA LITERATURA

Artículo completo no disponible en este idioma / Full article is not available in this language

Bibliography

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Planificación familiar [internet]. Ginebra: OMS; 2020 [citado 1 jun 2021]. Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/BklciJd
  2. Mohamed NM, Saber AG, Hassan AA. Perception of women towards contraceptive methods: using health belief model. IJANS. [internet] 2020 [citado 1 jun 2021]; 9(1):1-14. Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/cklcx0b
  3. Aristide C, Mwakisole A, Mwakisole N, Emmanuel M, Laizar E, Kihunrwa A, Downs D, Wamoyi J, Downs J. Design and pilot testing of a Church-based intervention to address interpersonal and intrapersonal barriers to uptake of family planning in rural Tanzania: a qualitative implementation study. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. 2020; 46:226-33. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200505
  4. Sen S, Centikaya A, Cavuslar A. Perception scale of barriers to contraceptive use: methodological study. Fertility research and practice. 2017; 3(1):11. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0038-9
  5. Unger JB, Molina GB. Contraceptive use among Latina women: social, cultural, and demographic correlates. Women’s health issues: official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health. 1998; 8(6):359. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1049-3867(98)00030-9
  6.  Brunie A, Tolley EE, Ngabo F, Wesson J, Chen M. Getting to 70%: barriers to modern contraceptive use for women in Rwanda. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2013; 123:e11-e15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.005
  7. Kabagenyi A, Reid A, Ntozi J, Atuyambe L. Socio-cultural inhibitors to use of modern contraceptive techniques in rural Uganda: a qualitative study. The Pan African Medical Journal. 2016; 25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.25.78.6613
  8. Wolgemuth TE, Cuddeback M, Callegari LS, Rodríguez KL, Zhao X, Borrero S. Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Contraceptive Use Among Women Veterans Accessing the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Women´s Health Issues. 2020; 30(1):57-63. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.08.005
  9. Pender NJ, Murdugh CL, Parsons MA. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. 8th.ed. Prentice Hall; 2018.
  10. Caudillo-Ortega L, Benavides-Torres RA, Valdez-Montero C, Flores-Arias ML, Hernández-Ramos MT. Modelo de conducta anticonceptiva en mujeres jóvenes: Teoría de Situación Específica. Índex Enferm. [internet] 2018 [citado 1 jun 2021]; 27(1-2):52-6. Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/TklcYcI
  11. Sterling SP, Sadler LS. Contraceptive use among adolescent Latinas living in the United States: The impact of culture acculturation. JPDHC. 2009; 23(1):19-28. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2008.02.004
  12. Truong S, Villar de Onis J, Lindley A, Bazúa R, Reyes A, Montaño M, Marcotrigiano L, Molina RL. Gender-Informed Family Planning Perceptions an Decision-Making in Rural Chiapas, Mexico. A Mixed Methods Study. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1929143
  13. Asekun-Olarinmoye EO, Adebimpe WO, Bamidele JO, Odu OO, Asekun-Olarinmove IO, Ojofeitimi EO. Barriers to use of modern contraceptives among women in an inner city area of Osogbo metropolis, Osun state, Nigeria. Intenational journal of women’s health. 2013; 5:647. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147%2FIJWH.S47604
  14. Meyers AB, Rhodes, JE. Oral contraceptive use among African American adolescents: individual and community influences. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1995; 23(1):99-115. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506924
  15. Nagase T, Kunni O, Wakai S, Khaleel A. Obstacles to modern contraceptive use among married women in southern urban Maldives. Contraception. 2003; 125-134. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00113-6
  16. Pesa JA, Turner LW, Mathews J. Sex differences in barriers to contraceptive use among adolescents. The journal of pediatrics. 2001; 139(5):689-93. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2001.118569
  17. Eltomy EM, Saboula NE, Hussein AA. Barriers affecting utilization of family planning services among rural Egyptian women. EMHJ. [internet] 2013 [citado 1 jun 2021]; 19(5):400-8. Disponible en: https://cutt.ly/OklcHip
  18. Geske S, Quevillon R, Struckman-Johnson C, Hansen K. Comparisons of contraceptive use between rural and urban teens. Journal of pediatric and adolescente gynecology. 2016; 19(1):33-41. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2015.06.002
  19. Arias-Flores ML, Champion JD, Soto NE, Tovar M, Dávila PE. Barriers to use of familu planning methods among heterosexual Mexican couples. Research and theory for nursing practice. 2017; 31(2):107-20. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1541-6577.31.2.107
  20. Eisen M, Zellman GL, McAlister AL. A health belif model approach to adolescents’ fertility control: Some pilot program findings. Health Education Quarterly. 1985; 12(2):185-210. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F109019818501200205
  21. Hanna KM. Effect of nurse-client transaction on female adolescent’s oral contraceptive adherence. Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 1993; 25(4):285-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00261.x
  22. Hanna KM. an oral contraceptive perception scale for female adolescents. Western journal of nursing research. 1997; 19(4):519-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F019394599701900407
  23. Wang RH, Jian SY, Yang YM. Pysichometric testing of the Chinese version of the Contraceptive Behavior Scale: a preliminary study. Journal of clinical nursing. 2013; 22(7-8):1066-72. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03785.x